search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 1
2.4
 

top rated funds:

Rated by 12
4.1

Rated by 12
4.0
 

Rated by 11
4.0
 

Rated by 15
4.0

Rated by 21
4.0

Rated by 31
3.9

Rated by 41
3.9

Rated by 11
3.8

Rated by 44
3.8

Rated by 106
3.8

Rated by 32
3.8

Rated by 31
3.8

Rated by 64
3.7

Rated by 23
3.7

Rated by 27
3.7

Rated by 13
3.7

Rated by 11
3.6

Rated by 17
3.6

Rated by 10
3.6
 

Rated by 62
3.6

Rated by 21
3.5

Rated by 12
3.5
 

Rated by 28
3.4

Rated by 19
3.4

Rated by 14
3.4
 

Rated by 49
3.4
 

Rated by 31
3.4

Rated by 16
3.4
 

Rated by 10
3.4

Rated by 13
3.4

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Fidelity Biosciences  CERTIFIED

No New Investments Warning:
Members have submitted information that the following organization(s) may not be making investments into new portfolio companies. This warning can be contested by submitting proof of a completed investment in a new portfolio company within the last four weeks here.

Firm Rating:

Rated 3.0 / 5.0 by 5
Track
Record
2.8
Operating
Competence
2.8
Pitching
Efficiency
3.8
Favorable
Deal Terms
2.8
Execution
Assistance
2.6

Firm Homepage:

FIRM OVERVIEW: Large Private VC founded in 2002 based out of Cambridge, USA (US East)

FIRM DESCRIPTION: Fidelity Biosciences invests venture capital in private biopharmaceutical and medical technology companies.

TEAM MEMBERS: Ben Auspitz, Stephen Knight, Wei Li,

0
Agree
1
Disagree

Good Team Worth It

Fund: Fidelity Biosciences

Posted by donbee6 on 2013-02-22

PUBLIC:

The team at Fidelity is knowledgeable and supportive. They are transparent when concerns exist and act professionally in resolving any issues. I would not hesitate to work with Fidelity on future projects.

PRIVATE: Members Only

2
Agree
1
Disagree

Pitching Efficiency Good, Everything Else Bad

Fund: Fidelity Biosciences

Posted by Anonymous on 2012-07-19

PUBLIC:

Not a good outfit to work with. Our company was funded by them. Neither Robert Weisskoff nor Tom Beck provided any additional value except for self serving suggestions and actions - the management and staff ended up hating them both. Definitely worth due diligence regarding who you get. For instance we didn't know that Tom Beck was fired within a year from Dyax for being such an arrogant jerk. I would never work with them again.

PRIVATE: Members Only (37 Characters)

2
Agree
1
Disagree

Ethically Challenged

Fund: Fidelity Biosciences

Posted by frodob137 on 2008-10-21

PUBLIC:

Low ethics, even for VCs - and that is saying a lot!

PRIVATE: Members Only

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Lack of Operational Experience, Provably Questionable Ethics

Fund: Fidelity Biosciences

Posted by Anonymous on 2011-08-03

PUBLIC:

Fidelity Biosciences is a small part of the Fidelity Empire - a family owned mega financial business. The Biosciences area is run by an ex MD with the arrogance that comes with that. Members of the team are in the same mold. They talk big but the team have little to no practical operational management experience. Most are inexperienced overcredentialed academics. Biosciences 'value add' to commercially oriented companies is negligable. Their manipulation of portfolio companies for the sake of greed at the expense of good business is unbelievable. Avoid.

PRIVATE: Members Only (383 Characters)