search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 41
2.6
 

top rated funds:

Rated by 12
4.5

Rated by 22
4.4

Rated by 11
4.2
 

Rated by 19
4.1

Rated by 39
4.0

Rated by 10
3.9

Rated by 30
3.9

Rated by 30
3.9

Rated by 63
3.8

Rated by 11
3.8

Rated by 43
3.8

Rated by 27
3.7

Rated by 105
3.7

Rated by 31
3.7

Rated by 11
3.6

Rated by 20
3.6

Rated by 16
3.6

Rated by 10
3.6
 

Rated by 62
3.6

Rated by 10
3.6

Rated by 20
3.5

Rated by 12
3.5
 

Rated by 18
3.4

Rated by 19
3.4

Rated by 14
3.4
 

Rated by 48
3.4
 

Rated by 31
3.4

Rated by 16
3.4
 

Rated by 11
3.4

Rated by 10
3.4

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Artiman Ventures

Firm Rating:

Rated 1.9 / 5.0 by 13
Track
Record
1.7
Operating
Competence
1.7
Pitching
Efficiency
1.9
Favorable
Deal Terms
2.2
Execution
Assistance
1.9

Firm Homepage:

FIRM OVERVIEW: Very Small Private VC founded in N/A based out of Palo Alto, United States (US West)

TEAM MEMBERS: Amit Shah, Dan Hodges, Kumar Ganapathy, M.J. Aravind, Roger A. Hajjar, Saurabh Srivastava, Tim Wilson, Yatin Mundkur,

6
Agree
2
Disagree

Just Stay Away

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by founder&ceo on 2009-11-29

PUBLIC:

Arrogant, not professional, and not telling the truth. Don't go to pitch them. if you get them, you have big chance to lose your company

PRIVATE: Members Only

11
Agree
1
Disagree

They Like to Think They Think Outside the Box

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2008-01-13

PUBLIC:

Artiman thinks it thinks outside the box. They do deals which are unusual. it is unclear however whether they understand enough about these businesses to be good judges.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Just a Question

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by wannabe on 2012-10-18

PUBLIC:

With the spate of bad reviews received by this fund and the arrogance demonstrated by many of the team members described in this forum who in his right mind would go in front of them. Arrogance seems to be the moniker of most VC's most funds partners don't seems to have received universally negatives ratings like this one.

When I read the descriptions of the personalities it hits home on how arrogantly they must behave. My question is whether it impacts their deal flow and quality of companies working with them. Guessing is that long term these guys will definitely have challenges , yet does it matter in today's frothy investment environment ?

PRIVATE: Members Only

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Unprofessional, Inexperienced, Waste of Your Time.

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2012-09-20

PUBLIC:

This was the worst VC experience I've ever had. No firm has ever leaned so heavily on my own resources or wasted my time as much as Artiman. There are a few gems within the fund, but the partner we dealt with should be avoided at all costs. In particular Ajit is really awesome. Read my private post for the rest.

PRIVATE: Members Only (3885 Characters)

4
Agree
0
Disagree

Stay Away!!

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by founder&ceo on 2009-11-23

PUBLIC:

don't spend time. cant help at all and looking for new CEO from day 1 so you have no chance to be successful with them

PRIVATE: Members Only

9
Agree
0
Disagree

Avoid and Save Time

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2008-08-01

PUBLIC:

Claiming to be early-stage investor is fashionable. Artiman is no exception. But their concept of early stage seems to be a fully proven business with patent protections, revenue, and everything else you expect of an already successful company on the verge of IPO or acquisition. They have a basic distrust of "techies". So if you are a techie (or so they think), even before they hear your pitch, they have already started searching for a new CEO (a so-called "business guy") to head your company. Master time wasters as far as new technology businesses are concerned. Basically there is not a single partner onboard who understands technology. No wonder their recent investments look like a bunch of lemons.

PRIVATE: Members Only

7
Agree
0
Disagree

Very Slow Process, Took forever to Get to a "No"

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by FloridaCEO on 2008-07-21

PUBLIC:

Just a VERY slow process.

PRIVATE: Members Only

12
Agree
0
Disagree

Sloooow Nooooo

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-12-18

PUBLIC:

We spent several months talking with them but they eventually did not fund us. In general, they are a waste of time, arrogant and ethically challenged.

PRIVATE: Members Only (123 Characters)

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Xxx

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by Bongo on 2007-08-07

PRIVATE: Members Only