search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 28
3.3
 

top rated funds:

Rated by 16
3.3

Rated by 10
3.3
 

Rated by 10
3.3

Rated by 23
3.3

Rated by 14
3.3

Rated by 38
3.3

Rated by 39
3.3

Rated by 34
3.3

Rated by 14
3.3

Rated by 47
3.2
 

Rated by 19
3.2

Rated by 39
3.2

Rated by 10
3.2
 

Rated by 40
3.2

Rated by 31
3.2

Rated by 33
3.2

Rated by 15
3.2

Rated by 10
3.2
 

Rated by 21
3.2

Rated by 23
3.2

Rated by 15
3.2

Rated by 50
3.1

Rated by 28
3.1

Rated by 14
3.1

Rated by 43
3.1

Rated by 26
3.1
 

Rated by 37
3.1

Rated by 12
3.0

Rated by 13
3.0

Rated by 26
3.0

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Member Post

TheFunded.com is an online community of over 20,000 CEOs, Founders and entrepreneurs to discuss fundraising, rate and review angel investors and venture capitalists, and discuss strategies to grow a startup business. Enjoy the site, and be sure to join us at our Founder Showcase events to meet the community.

Sign-up for Membership

5
Agree
2
Disagree

Avoid Benchmark: the Scoprion and the Frog

Fund: Benchmark Capital

Posted by SuperUber on 2017-08-24

PUBLIC:

The behavior of Benchmark with Uber and Travis Kalanick is repressible, and no good entrepreneur should work with this firm. Someone needs to speak out. Leaving aside allegations of sexism within the company, a closer look at the "invisible hand" of Benchmark is needed.

Why did Benchark give Travis key Board allocations if he were so bad? Why did they orchestrate a maneuver to kick him out after his parents suffered a terrible accident? Why have they been meddling in day-to-day operations at the company? Why are they suing with defamatory and knowingly false allegations lifted from another lawsuit? Why are they tormenting other Board Members?

Travis himself may have the answer in a 2011 video, in which there is a slide titled, "VCs tend to kill founding CEOs:"

https://t.co/8aGkN7bgdg

It's time that the true inside story gets told. The Board Members do not like Benchmark, and with good reason. Everyone is sitting on a diamond, and, like the scorpion and the frog parable, Benchmark had to kill the frog. It's in their nature.

Why did they kill the frog? There are three reasons:

1. Liquidity - Each Benchmark partner will make $250 MM to $500 MM on Uber. Tnis is more profit more than many of the founding engineers and executives. Any of the sexism scandals have delayed an IPO, so why not create turmoil to get bought out?

2. Liability - Bill Gurley is the first institutional investor. He was a close advisor and mentor. Lawyers at Benchmark warned that the fund may be liable for the actions within Uber. So, why not blame the CEO as you boot him out the door to shift the blame and the liability?

3. Bank Heist - Benchmark owns only 13% of the business. By removing Travis and opening the three Board Seats that he controls, this allows Benchmark to gain control of the business. If they can not get bought out at a high price by threatening other Board Members, then why not control one of the largest private companies in Silicon Valley and do as you please?

Abuse of power has returned to the world of venture capital, and Uber is the poster child of this new movement. Their Machiavellian schemes are reprehensible. Over the coming days, the story will start to come out. Chris Sacca is involved. False stories have been planted. It's ugly.

"A scorpion asks a frog to carry it across a river. The frog hesitates, afraid of being stung, but the scorpion argues that if it did so, they would both drown. Considering this, the frog agrees, but midway across the river the scorpion does indeed sting the frog, dooming them both. When the frog asks the scorpion why, the scorpion replies that it was in its nature to do so."

PRIVATE: Members Only