search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 13
3.0
 

top rated funds:

Rated by 22
4.4

Rated by 11
4.1
 

Rated by 12
4.1

Rated by 15
4.0

Rated by 21
4.0

Rated by 30
3.9

Rated by 40
3.9

Rated by 11
3.8

Rated by 44
3.8

Rated by 105
3.8

Rated by 32
3.8

Rated by 31
3.8

Rated by 12
3.8

Rated by 64
3.7

Rated by 21
3.7

Rated by 27
3.7

Rated by 11
3.6

Rated by 16
3.6

Rated by 10
3.6
 

Rated by 62
3.6

Rated by 21
3.5

Rated by 12
3.5
 

Rated by 28
3.4

Rated by 19
3.4

Rated by 14
3.4
 

Rated by 49
3.4
 

Rated by 31
3.4

Rated by 16
3.4
 

Rated by 11
3.4

Rated by 10
3.4

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Member Post

TheFunded.com is an online community of over 18,000 CEOs, Founders and entrepreneurs to discuss fundraising, rate and review investors, and discuss strategies to grow a start-up business. Enjoy!

Sign-up for Membership

0
Agree
1
Disagree

Good So Cal a Round Fund

Fund: Palomar Ventures

Posted by mktgmann on 2008-04-30

PUBLIC:

We pitched Amanda Reed and Palomar last year, and although we ended up not going with them, they were good to work with.

Palomar is a traditional small-midsized VC doing earlier stage deals. You probably should have some working product and revenue, but they also do seed stage. The partners all seem to be more of the hands-on operating types, not as many former wall-street or big name firm types.

Amanda immediately understood our business model, was very aggressive and efficient about her due diligence and getting us in front of her partnership. In fact, if anything, we had to slow them down a bit for our process.

Amanda/Palomar provided us a reasonable term sheet on both valuation and T's and C's and I would certainly recommend them to software companies who are seeking A-round funding.

PRIVATE: Members Only