search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 2
4.9

top rated funds:

Rated by 11
2.7
 

Rated by 19
2.7

Rated by 41
2.7

Rated by 35
2.7

Rated by 17
2.7

Rated by 11
2.6
 

Rated by 21
2.6
 

Rated by 12
2.6

Rated by 21
2.6

Rated by 11
2.6
 

Rated by 36
2.6

Rated by 26
2.6

Rated by 13
2.6

Rated by 21
2.6

Rated by 38
2.6

Rated by 25
2.6

Rated by 41
2.6
 

Rated by 10
2.5
 

Rated by 11
2.5
 

Rated by 30
2.4
 

Rated by 22
2.4
 

Rated by 15
2.4

Rated by 23
2.4

Rated by 14
2.3
 

Rated by 11
2.2
 

Rated by 15
2.2
 

Rated by 16
2.2

Rated by 19
2.1

Rated by 19
2.1

Rated by 15
2.1
 

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Welcome

TheFunded.com is an online community of over 20,000 CEOs, Founders and entrepreneurs to discuss fundraising, rate and review angel investors and venture capitalists, and discuss strategies to grow a startup business. Enjoy the site, and be sure to join us at our Founder Showcase events to meet the community.

  Sign-up for Membership  

TAGS: Director (1)   shareholders (1)   Lead (1)   Latin America (1)   pricing (2)    More
NEW SHOWCASE: Twigmore: Your Travel Network on Facebook (Internet/B2C)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Need Advice on China Business Trip

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2014-01-27

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Good Experience with Brian Wilcove?

Fund: Artiman Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2014-01-23

PRIVATE: Members Only (288 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Innovative B2 B Solution for Advertising

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2014-01-19

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Great Late Stage Firm

Fund: Institutional Venture Partners

Posted by Anonymous on 2014-01-19

PUBLIC:

Worked with Jules Maltz. He's amazingly good. Smart, funny, engaging. Cares about the company. Cant say enough good things.

Fast turnaround, had a decision quickly. Closed as they stated - no changes. Been a GREAT investor.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Jump Starting Dialogue & Interaction on the Funded?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2014-01-15

Europe BioTech/Health First Round Terms

TheFunded.com Terms

Posted by System on 2014-01-09

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Angel List is Not the Answer for Early Stage Dysfunction

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2014-01-06

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Compensate Investor that Brings in Outside Investment

TheFunded.com Advice

Posted by mazzarello on 2014-01-06

PUBLIC:

Looking for advice on what to pay a person for bringing in significant fund raise for the company.

PRIVATE: Members Only (583 Characters)

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Seed/Angel or A/Venture Round?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-30

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Really Outstanding Team Very Supportive

Fund: LDC (Lloyds TSB Development Capital)

Posted by Heiko Schmidt on 2013-12-25

PUBLIC:

After talking with many PE funds worldwide, LDC really made the difference for us.
We were always treated as part of the inner family and got support and help also outside our M&A activities.
Darryl is one of the smartest guys I had the pleasure to meet. He really created an incredible effective team. Plus, working with these guys is fun.
My communication point is Tim Farazmand and even if our actual project Gideen is more in an early financing stage, Tim is supporting us on our advisory board.

PRIVATE: Members Only (311 Characters)

4
Agree
2
Disagree

Larry Begley is Terrible

Fund: 406 Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-24

PUBLIC:

I have to agree with the comments of previous posters. I know Larry and he is one of the worst VCs around. He really doesn't belong. He should go back to being a controller or just retire. He had some good luck that made him some money without being good - typical boom tech story of late 90s by being at the right place when someone way overpaid and no value was created, but he was just crunching unrealistic forecast numbers.

PRIVATE: Members Only

3
Agree
0
Disagree

Castile is Dead Bye Bye Nina

Fund: Castile Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-23

PUBLIC:

This was a bad firm - now it is gone. Typical boom time firm without a real purpose or team. Everyone on Boston knows it.

Nina talks more than any VC I know... and makes no sense.

I have had to roll my eyes many times and hold myself back from laughing..

Goodbye.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Pricing Model for Video Ads

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-18

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Silicon Valley Arrogance Redux

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-17

US Central BioTech/Health First Round Terms

TheFunded.com Terms

Posted by System on 2013-12-15

0
Agree
0
Disagree

VC's Interested in Mid Market Cloud Erp Space

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-15

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Is It Possible to Sell Your Company to a fortune 500 While Being Patent Trolled?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-15

0
Agree
2
Disagree

Wasted My Time

Fund: True Ventures

Posted by ANGT4VCBS on 2013-12-13

PUBLIC:

As an entrepreneur, rejection is a part of the game. A simple "no" is fine, and feedback on why there is a "no" is respected. That is not what happened here. After some runaround, I was referred to meet with an employee straight out of college. This is what PG would refer to as a "dickish move" which would only lead to wasting time. If that was truly respected entrepreneurs, they would give a clear answer instead of playing games. Therefore I give you a heads up so that you can avoid wasting your time.

PRIVATE: Members Only (137 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Great Feedback and Coaching

Fund: Leapfrog Ventures

Posted by Simon on 2013-12-12

PUBLIC:

My company is outside the core of Leapfrog Ventures and normally I would not approach such a VC. However, I was attracted by having two principals who are entrepreneurs and MIT engineers. ie I felt these partners are the type that truly earned their stripes and they are not some green finance geeks who could not manage the local 7-11 yet acts like he is God's gift to Venture Financing (you know the type I am describing). I was pleasantly surprised to get a quick response indicating that this was outside their core (which of course I already knew). However, knowing my company is outside their core, I thought that would be a good place to practice the pitch and ask some feedback. I was pleasantly surprised that Peter agreed to meet me for an hour and listen to the pitch and provide feedback. Within about 24 hours of initial contact, I met Peter in Menlo Park. He listened to the pitch attentively and provided some great feedback on the pitch, on the story, on what is missing. He provided some suggestions on addressing the (internal) questions that a VC would have listening to the pitch that I needed to proactively address. Most VC's don't even offer any feedback and Pete not only offered feedback but also provided some coaching and good advice. Truly you can tell that he is a class act. To top it all, he took the time to do this in mid December when everyone is usually really pressed for time. Bottom line, this is a super classy VC and I would highly recommend Leapfrog

PRIVATE: Members Only (51 Characters)

1
Agree
3
Disagree

Angellist the Wrong Answer to the Early Stage Problem

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-12

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Sundeep is the Absolutely Awful

Fund: Felicis Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-11

PUBLIC:

While introduced to Aydin, I met with Sundeep. Out of 100+ VC conversations I've had, he was literally the absolute worst. Arrogant and disrespectful. Talked a LOT more than he listened. And in our one hour meeting came across as if he was trying to prove he's the smartest guy in the room. His behavior was especially strange because he had very little domain expertise in our area, yet rather than listening, was espousing strong opinions. In summary, the guy came across like a total clown. Really reflects poorly on Aydin personally, who seems to have a great reputation. If someone can figure out why he's on the team, I'd love to know, if only to understand how Aydin made the decision to hire him.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Any Angle/VC Resources for Non Tech Companies?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-11

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Worst Experience

Fund: Khosla Ventures

Posted by voyager1 on 2013-12-11

PUBLIC:

My company just pitched to dozens in VCs in the valley. We received substantial backing from numerous establish VCs.

Looking back, my worst experience was with Euan at Kholsa. He was very late to the meeting, and he had to leave early too. In addition, he spent the entire meeting on his cell phone, occasionally looking up to murmur off things about Kholsa's rigid theses. He went on and on about how we didn't send him our deck ahead of time.

At least he gave us a curt pass email after the meeting -- and another forced request for us to send over our full deck.

I've spoken with many other credible startups that have pitched to Euan / Kholsa. It sounds like this is a pattern. Under no circumstances will we ever take money from these guys. Also, I hear that Vinod is a holy terror.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Paid Q&A Site Building Critical Mass

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-10

0
Agree
1
Disagree

Good Experience From Pitch to Close

Fund: Intel Capital

Posted by SecurityEntrepreneur on 2013-12-09

PUBLIC:

When started first to discuss with Intel Capital, I was skeptical. Concerns about being "too corporate", "difficult to negotiate with and close" etc were some inputs I received.
I was pleasantly surprised.
The Director assigned to us was top notch. He got the business and opportunity quickly and was able to connect with appropriate parties in Intel Corporate quickly to get feedback and assess possible business synergy.
Negotiation was professional, reasonable and timely. No "playing games" or "corporate stuff". Main somewhat unique requirement was an Observer seat on the board, which was ok with us.
Deal terms were fair. From several term sheets provided by other firms, Intel's was not the best but above the median.
We ended up closing with them on the round - due to combination of the individual director assigned, the fair terms and the brand/strategic value (which was important to our security related business).

A year+ into the relationship, ongoing work with the Intel rep is very well. We received several good introductions to Intel business partners for business development as well as multiple strong referrals to executive candidates for positions we were looking for. Reasonable oversight via board observer seat as well as very good sounding board as we discuss strategy.

Overall - very happy with the decision to partner with Intel Capital.

PRIVATE: Members Only (95 Characters)